Just In: INEC moves to halt enforcement of judgment ordering ADC, Accord deregistration
Home - News

Just In: INEC moves to halt enforcement of judgment ordering ADC, Accord deregistration

today

Just In: INEC moves to halt enforcement of judgment ordering ADC, Accord deregistration

Admin By Adewale Adewale
  • 95
  • 3 min
  • 0

The Independent National Electoral Commission has approached the Court of Appeal in Abuja seeking a stay of execution of a Federal High Court judgment that ordered the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress and four other political parties.

The electoral body also backed the notice of appeal filed by the affected parties against the ruling.

A Federal High Court in Abuja, presided over by Justice Peter Lifu, had on Monday ordered INEC to deregister the ADC, Action Peoples Party, Action Alliance, Accord Party and Zenith Labour Party, ruling that they failed to meet constitutional requirements necessary to retain their registration.

At the resumed hearing before a three-member panel of the Court of Appeal on Tuesday, INEC, through its counsel, Haliru Mohammed, said the commission was surprised that the lower court proceeded to deliver the judgment despite an earlier order of the appellate court.

“My Lords, we are aware of an order that this court made on May 22, which stopped the delivery of the judgment of the lower court, which was initially reserved for delivery on June 5,” Mohammed said.

“We were not aware of any notice from the court regarding the delivery of the judgment. We only saw it as breaking news in the media.

“We therefore do not oppose the application of the appellant to stay the execution of the judgment.”

Counsel to the ADC, Mr. Shuaibu Aruwa (SAN), also informed the appellate court that the party received notification of the judgment through a WhatsApp message from the trial court.

Aruwa urged the appellate court to intervene, arguing that the lower court’s decision was delivered despite the subsisting order of the Court of Appeal.

“Sincerely, my Lords, a lot has happened to the judiciary and this profession. What the trial judge did was dare this Court of Appeal by insisting that no one could arrest his judgment, even after his attention was drawn to the stay order from this court,” he said.

“The action of the trial judge calls for swift and extraordinary measures from this court. We have come to the stage where this court should press the reset button.

“We are calling on this court to exercise disciplinary jurisdiction under Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended.

“We urge this court to take disciplinary steps by immediately suspending that judgment. This court has the power to protect its own integrity. We pray this court suspends the judgment immediately without further delay.”

Lawyers representing the affected political parties also drew the court’s attention to the by-elections scheduled by INEC for June 20 in six states, arguing that allowing the judgment to stand could create uncertainties in the electoral process.

They maintained that the Court of Appeal possesses inherent powers to act in a supervisory capacity and ensure compliance with its orders by lower courts.

The appellate court was still taking submissions from parties in the matter as of the time of filing this report.

Prev Post

Justice Lifu exhibited rascality, an affront to court hierarchy - Appeal stays ADC, Accord, others deregistration order

Next Post

Released from prison in Nov 2025, Baba Ijesa welcomes baby boy

Newsletter

Get every weekly update & insights

Comment(s) 0

Leave a Reply

BACK TO TOP